Do you know the flow of money?

What is the flow of money?


A landlord will certainly engage a renting agent to secure a rent deal; in return, the particular agent will be paid out a commission-based fee. This is known as the flow of money (or even flow of commission). The actual tenant, meanwhile, is going to be required to deal with the actual leasing agent in order to obtain the lease.


Does the flow of money favour the owner or the leasee?


The question associated with whether a renting agent is ultimately acting in the best interest with the leasee or landlord is really a complex and sensitive one. Understandably, the type of the lease or even engagement with the landlord will affect the characteristics of the proceedings.


For example, if a commercial actuel is seeking long-term surety for their business, they may participate in a lease expression of 3, 5 or 10 years. For the leasing agent, this means any possible income arising from the particular transaction will only take place at these relatively long intervals. This can impact any profit the agent stands to get from the transaction, particularly when this is the only house they are representing for this landlord.



On the other hand, if your leasing agent is representing a landlord around multiple properties, you have the potential to gain several fees within the identical period. This elevated incentive could potentially influence the actions of the realtor, who may act strategically in order to increase their earnings.


While most agents will provide neutral information in order to facilitate a fair deal for all events, the fact remains that the details an agent discloses to a potential leasee is up to their own discretion. This theoretically means that the tenant or landlord will finish up being deprived if the pull associated with commission swings the particular favour in the other direction.


Brokers vs CRES - that do they favour as well as who pays?


It’s additionally worth considering the role associated with broker commissions and corporate real estate services (CRES), which could work in the favor of either the landlord or the property occupier.


Brokers act on behalf of the landlord. They are paid any commission when they are been shown to be the “effective cause” of the rent transaction, e.g. by providing an approved offer you and a signed hire. The broker’s commission is added to the cost of the tenant’s lease rental as well as amortised over the cost of the particular lease - so essentially, the tenant pays the fee.


CRES providers represent the interests of the occupier with the properties (the renter or the owner-occupier). Their expertise in commercial property may benefit customers by helping them save money upon rental and house expenses, and minimising risk through aiding with strategic house decisions. CRES providers are typically paid by the celebration whose interests they will represent and are not usually paid from the property funds.


How can impartial Property Reviewed aid level out the game?


As discussed previously mentioned, the current flow of money system creates a ‘loophole’ which means, in some cases, a potential tenant might not receive the complete picture in regards to a commercial property, along with certain pieces of information remaining undisclosed. This leaves the leasee at a distinct disadvantage when making a decision on a commercial property.



Through providing an online platform in which lets former as well as current tenants leave unbiased reviews with regards to a property, we try to close this gap and bring much-needed transparency for the commercial property business.


Future tenants benefit from clear and available information about the property, while property owners and administrators gain access to valuable property analytics and informative feedback about their area.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *